™ & © 2023 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. No time frame was shared on when the investigation might be completed, Burris said. We provided the highest degree of transparency possible that we could with this case,” she said.īurris said his clients are pleased with the decision, as they think a review by another prosecutor is justified. “I heard the public’s concerns and we released a comprehensive analysis and report that included investigative records, witness statements and video evidence, so the public could see all of the facts and details and understand how we arrived at our decision. so people gotta support and assist in getting Fatal Frame 4 the profits required to make Fatal Frame 6 happen. if Fata lFrame 4 remaster sells enough then Fatal Frame 6 could be green lit. NIntendo cant just hand out cash and have someone else make a game with an IP they dont control or own. Imagine Fatal Frame, Devotion-style, on the Switch. San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins welcomes the attorney general’s review and “will assist and cooperate as needed,” she told CNN in a statement Tuesday. Fatal Frame 5 sold well enough to convince them to remaster Fatal Frame 4. FATAL FRAME 6 Speaking wildly, Nintendo could throw a bunch of money at Red Candle Games and see what they would come up with. “There is no evidence to contradict that Anthony’s fear was honest,” the report states.
The district attorney’s report notes that self-defense applies when a person has a reasonable belief they are in imminent danger of being killed or suffering great bodily harm. Police did not find a knife in Brown’s possession, the report states, but prosecutors still determined his fear was reasonable.Ĭolorado woman hit by train while trapped in police car says memory loss should block criminal case against her The killing and lack of charges spurred protests in San Francisco amid a larger debate over criminal justice in the Northern California city, with demonstrators marching to demand justice for Brown.Ī written report from the district attorney’s office released last week said Brown had repeatedly threatened to stab the security guard before the shooting. “We can confirm that our office has agreed to review whether the San Francisco District Attorney’s decision not to file charges was an abuse of discretion,” the California attorney general’s office told CNN in a statement. The review comes after the San Francisco district attorney’s office said last week that security guard Michael Anthony would not face criminal charges because he acted in self-defense when he shot Banko Brown on April 27.īrown’s family attorney John Burris, who previously described the guard’s actions as “way beyond what was reasonable and necessary,” sent a letter to the attorney general’s office last week requesting the investigation.
The California attorney general’s office will review the decision not to charge a security guard in the fatal shooting of a suspected shoplifter last month at a Walgreens store in downtown San Francisco, it said Tuesday.
By Veronica Miracle and Taylor Romine | CNN
0 kommentar(er)
